I. Macroeconomic Environment and Trade Risk Analysis

The textile, apparel, and fashion industries are subject to the combined impacts of consumer sentiment, exchange rates, supply chains, and regulations (ESG/EPR).
Amidst recovering demand for fast fashion and short-cycle reorders, the shift in sourcing to Korea, ASEAN, India, and Bangladesh is accelerating due to diversification of China risk. B2B demand for high-value-added knitwear/functional materials, athleisure, and workwear/uniforms remains robust.

 

Risk factors

2025-2026 Outlook

Influence (1~5)

Implications

Consumer sentiment/inventorygradual normalization3Short lead times and on-demand production are important.
Sourcing diversificationChina → ASEAN/South Asia transition5Cumulative use of RCEP and bilateral FTAs
Labor, Ethics, and ESGDue diligence obligations and wage increases4Audit, Traceability, and Supply Chain Contract Standardization
EPR/Circular EconomyExpanded recycling and labeling obligations4r-yarn, modular design, and fiber passport compliance
Exchange rates and faresModerate volatility2Optimizing shipping and insurance conditions
Ⅱ. FTA Utilization Rate and Corporate Practice Statistics

Clothing (HS61/62) benefits significantly from reduced tariff rates in major markets . In practice, however, PSR (tariff change, RVC), processing process assessment , and yarn/fabric origin tracking are key bottlenecks.
For fabrics and knitwear (HS54-60), HS and PSR levels vary depending on functionality and blending ratio, making advance assessment crucial.

division

FTA applicability (trend)

Major challenges

Management Points

Finished clothing products (HS61/62)Generally, the transition from high rate to low rate/tariff-free is felt.PSR (CTH/RVC)·Fair judgmentMatching country of origin of sewing, yarn/fabric
Knit/crocheted fabric (HS60)Varies depending on mixing ratio and functionalityFunctional processing evidenceTest report/processing process diagram
Fabrics and yarns (HS54~59)MFN deviation existsHS subclassification/blending ratioRaw material CO·Spec sheet
Accessories (HS6212, etc.)Medium tariff effectOrigin of raw materialsBOM·RVC automatic tracking
III. Matrix of Comparison of Tariffs and Non-Tariffs by Country

While the US, EU, and UK are significantly benefiting from the agreement's tariff reductions, rules of origin, labeling, testing, and human rights due diligence remain substantial barriers.
ASEAN and South Asia face significant variance in certification and customs procedures , and the regional accumulation of RCEP and bilateral FTAs ​​impacts cost competitiveness.

market

Representative items

MFN (trend)

When FTA is applied

Non-tariff barriers (example)

Comments

USAT-shirts, pants, and outerwearMedium and high ratesLow-rate/tariff-free expansionLabeling, Safety, Pediatrics, and CBP InspectionFiber agreements and order lead times are important.
EUKnitwear, dresses, and shirtsMedium rateWide-ranging cutsTextile Passport·REACH·EPRTrends in strengthening chemical substances and labeling
ukKnitwear/Men's ClothingMedium rateInhaUKCA·Labeling RegulationsSimilar to the EU, but with separate procedures
japanKnitting/MaterialsMedium and low ratesWidespread cutsJIS·Label·Shape SafetyHigh demands on quality and durability
ASEAN/IndiaYarn, fabric, and clothingMedium rateRCEP/Bilateral ReductionDiscrepancies in certificate of origin and customs clearanceGreat cumulative effect

Note: Actual tax rates and requirements vary depending on HS, blending ratio, and processing process, so prior HTS/PSR determination is recommended.

Ⅳ. ESG·CBAM/EPR Impact

Although not directly subject to CBAM, Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) , Textile Passport (digital product passport) , and chemical regulations (e.g., REACH) are expanding.
Recycled fibers (r-PET, r-nylon), bio-based yarns, non-toxic dyeing and processing, and energy-saving processes are emerging as supply requirements.

System/Issue

Core requirements

Influence (1~5)

react

EPR (clothing)Recovery/Recycling Targets/Fees5Reverse recovery network and r-material usage rate management
Textile PassportData digitization of materials, chemicals, and repair information4Digital label, QR, and PLM integration
Chemical substance regulationsProhibition, Restriction, and Test Documents4ZDHC·MRSL·Test Registry
Labor and Human Rights InspectionManagement of audit, wages, and night work4Supplier Code/Third-Party Audit
V. Investment and Supply Chain Transition Scenario

Korea: R&D on high-performance knitwear, technical fabrics, and smart textiles, and a small-quantity, multi-variety sampling hub.

Vietnam/Indonesia/Cambodia: Maximize tariff savings through bulk garment and packaging sourcing and RCEP accumulation .

India/Bangladesh: Cotton and fabric-based casual wear, competitively priced (quality and delivery management required)

EU/US Local: Small-batch production, digital printing, repair, and refurbishment for custom/reorders

Ⅵ. AI-based 3-month export and import forecasts

Combining news and consumer sentiment (α), global sentiment (β), and sector sentiment (λ). Signals of gradual improvement due to inventory normalization, recovery in reorders, and the cumulative effects of the RCEP .

variable

Δ(%) or exponent

analysis

ΔExport_now+2.1Driving demand for knitwear, athleisure, and uniforms
ΔImport_now+1.4Reinforcement of yarn, auxiliary materials, and functional fabrics
ΔPrice_now+0.3Reflecting the premium of functionality and eco-friendliness
ΔSignal_now+0.026Consumer sentiment and reorder recovery
ΔFTAEffect+0.31Tariff gap + regional cumulative effect
Forecast_3M+0.473-month gradual rise forecast

Formula (summary): Forecast_3M = 0.5·ΔSignal + 0.3·ΔFTAEffect + 0.2·ΔPrice

VII. Policy Recommendations and System Improvement Roadmap

field

Suggestion

Executor

Expected effect

Country of Origin/PSRPSR Guide/Judgment Service by Sewing and Processing ProcessKorea Customs Service and KOTRAReduce the risk of rejection and collection
EPR·Circular EconomyRecovery and Recycling Infrastructure IncentivesMinistry of Environment/Local GovernmentPremium/Bidding Competitiveness
Digital PassportSupport for DPP standard, QR, and PLM integrationMinistry of Trade, Industry and Energy and Trade AssociationMeeting delivery requirements and brand trust
Human Rights and EthicsSupply Chain Due Diligence Vouchers and TrainingMinistry of Employment and Labor and Ministry of SMEs and StartupsStrengthening buyer audit response capabilities
Smart manufacturingSmall-quantity, multi-variety, on-demand infrastructureLocal Government/Innovation CenterReduce lead time and inventory costs
Ⅷ. Summary of Conclusions

The effectiveness of FTAs ​​in textiles, clothing, and fashion is the sum of tariff reduction + PSR compliance + EPR/chemical/human rights regulation response .

Forecast_3M: +0.47 — A gradual rise centered on knitwear, functional apparel, uniforms, and B2B.

Recommended strategies: ① RCEP cumulative and multi-source sourcing ② DPP and EPR preemptive response ③ ZDHC and testing registry ④ Digital on-demand production/reorder system.