I. Macroeconomic Environment and Trade Risk Analysis

The automotive and mobility components industry (HS 8708, 8703, etc.) is facing combined pressures from the restructuring of the global supply chain and strengthening carbon regulations in 2025-2026.
In particular, the introduction of the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the EU's CBAM ( Comprehensive Carbon-Based Mobility Agreement ) will require a recalibration of FTA strategies centered on eco-friendly and electric vehicle components
. Exports of internal combustion engine components are expected to slow after 2026, accelerating the structural shift toward batteries, power electronics, and hydrogen mobility components .

Risk factors

2025-2026 Outlook

Influence (1~5)

Implications

IRA Detailed GuidelinesStrengthening the proportion of North American assembly and parts5The need for direct investment in North American factories and the cumulative use of FTAs.
EU CBAMDirect target for steel and aluminum parts4Obtaining material LCA and supply chain carbon data is essential.
Korea-EUFTA Origin ManagementWeak management capabilities of small and medium-sized partner companies3RVC Compliance Guide Needed
Geopolitical risksLogistics uncertainty in Europe and the Middle East3The need to establish a multi-regional procurement network
Exchange rates and raw material pricesStabilizing trend2Long-term foreign exchange hedging and futures contracts in parallel
Ⅱ. FTA Utilization Rate and Corporate Practice Statistics

While FTA utilization rates are generally high, at approximately 91% for finished vehicles and 83% for parts, the complexity of country of origin determination (based on PSR and RVC) and the multi-layered supply chain structure
continue to impose a significant burden on small and medium-sized parts companies. The IRA and North American production requirements necessitate a dual strategy
of "FTA application + localization."

division

FTA application rate (%)

Major challenges

Response points

Completed vehicle (8703)91RVC Determination/Local Procurement RatioExpansion of North American and EU assembly bases
Core Components (8708)83Multinational parts origin managementUtilization of the autonomous issuance system
Electric vehicle parts (8507·8544)87Proof of origin for batteries and modulesParallel implementation of IRA and Korea-US FTA
2nd and 3rd tier vendors69Lack of documentation and management capabilitiesEstablishment of a joint association system
III. Matrix of Comparison of Tariffs and Non-Tariffs by Country

While most finished vehicles and parts are duty-free thanks to the FTA, subsidies, environmental regulations, and procurement systems have emerged as new non-tariff barriers.
The US continues to impose IRAs, the EU continues to impose CBAMs, and China continues to pressure domestic demand protection and domestic production.

market

MFN(%)

FTA application (%)

difference

Major non-tariff barriers

note

USA2.5~50-2.5~-5IRA, Funding Regulations, and Grant ConditionsLocal production in North America is essential
EU3~100-3~-10CBAM·REACH·EcodesignStrengthening material and carbon management
china15~255~8-10~-17Certification and localization regulationsPrice competition and domestic demand protection in parallel
Vietnam and Thailand10~300-10~-30Technology, quality standards, and quarantineThere is great potential for RCEP utilization.
Ⅳ. ESG·CBAM Impact

The automotive parts industry, with its high carbon-intensive materials like steel, aluminum, and plastics, is
directly subject to the EU CBAM (2026). Pressure to implement LCA, RE100, and carbon certification systems
is expected to increase from 2025 .

policy

Main contents

Implementation period

Influence (1~5)

Response strategy

EU CBAMDirect taxation of steel, aluminum, etc.20265Establishing LCA for each product and process
RE100OEM-led complete vehicleAlways4Power procurement and supply chain linkage
ISO14067Carbon Footprint Certification20253Joint consulting is needed for small and medium-sized partner companies.
ESG disclosureOEM/parts linkage2025~20274ESG data standardization
V. Investment and Supply Chain Transition Scenario

North America (IRA response) : Local assembly of battlefield components, motors, and battery modules and utilization of accumulated FTAs.

EU (Carbon/CBAM Response) : Securing an R&D hub focused on lightweight components and recycled materials.

ASEAN (cost competitiveness) : Utilizing RCEP and establishing local assembly lines

Korea (Global Hub) : Maintaining a technology hub focused on RE100 manufacturing and AI quality control.

Ⅵ. AI-based 3-month export and import forecasts

The AutoLoop analysis, which integrates recent news sentiment (α), global sentiment (β), and sector sentiment (λ), suggests a gradual
three-month recovery for the automotive and mobility parts industry . North American exports are expected to increase after the details of the IRA application are finalized, while the EU may face a temporary burden due to the costs of responding to the CBAM.

variable

Δ(%)

analysis

ΔExport_now+2.4Demand recovery in North America and the EU, centered on electric vehicle components
ΔImport_now+1.8Expanding imports of batteries and electrical components
ΔPrice_now+0.3Rising unit prices for high-end components and lightweight materials
ΔSignal_now+0.028Maintaining positive signals (IRA·CBAM expectations)
ΔFTAEffect+0.33Tariff + Subsidy Eligibility Effect
Forecast_3M+0.51 (bullish forecast)A gradual recovery is expected within three months.
VII. Policy Recommendations and System Improvement Roadmap

field

Suggestion

Executor

Expected effect

Ensuring FTA-IRA ConsistencyNorth American cumulative requirements specifiedMinistry of Trade, Industry and Energy and Korea Customs ServiceEnsuring procurement eligibility
Support for small and medium-sized enterprisesExpanding country of origin determination and LCA consulting servicesMinistry of Trade, Industry and Energy·KOTRAStrengthening partner response capabilities
CBAM responseExpanding Carbon Data Platform and RE100 CertificationMinistry of Environment/Local GovernmentCBAM cost reduction
digital tradeIncluding automotive software and IP FTATrade Negotiation HeadquartersActivation of data trading
Supply Chain FinanceESG+FTA Certification-Based Trade FinanceKorea Finance CorporationImprove cash flow
Ⅷ. Summary of Conclusions

The FTA effect has evolved beyond 'tariff reduction' to the level of influencing IRA, CBAM, and ESG response capabilities.

Forecast_3M: +0.51 — A moderate recovery is expected, and a dual response from North America and the EU is essential.

Future strategic directions:
① Localization in North America + cumulative utilization
② Establishment of carbon data in preparation for EU CBAM
③ Establishment of an integrated support system for FTAs ​​and LCAs for small and medium-sized enterprises
④ Expansion of FTA provisions in response to mobility electrification and hydrogenation.